Governor Rell: Executive Order No. 1
These pages are being preserved for historical purposes under the auspices of the Connecticut State Library www.cslib.org
CTgov State of Connecticut
Home Biography Online Forms Contact Governor Rell
Executive Orders Resource Links Legislative Information Publications FAQ Lt. Gov. Fedele

 

 

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

BY HER EXCELLENCY

 

M. JODI  RELL

 

GOVERNOR

 

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 1

  

            WHEREAS, public office is a public trust and the Office of the Governor is committed to restoring public confidence; and

 

            WHEREAS, the State of Connecticut has long been committed to establishing rules and regulations to provide safeguards to support the highest standards of public integrity and ethical principles; and

 

            WHEREAS, transactions relating to the expenditure of public funds require the highest degree of public trust; and

 

            WHEREAS, all public servants should seek to adhere to a high standard of ethical conduct when performing state business; and

 

            WHEREAS, each and every public servant should strive to avoid both actual conflict of interests and any appearance of impropriety;

 

            NOW, THEREFORE, I, M. Jodi Rell, Governor of the State of Connecticut, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and Statutes of the State, do hereby ORDER and DIRECT

 

1.         There shall be a Special Counsel For Ethics Compliance who shall be appointed by and report directly to the Governor.  Such Special Counsel for Ethics Compliance shall: advise the Governor on public integrity issues; advise the Executive Branch, staff of the Office of the Governor and all agency heads, on ethics laws and any ethics guidelines adopted by the Governor; bring directly to the Governor's attention any conduct or business practices that, in the opinion of the Special Counsel, may violate current ethics laws or are inconsistent with ethics guidelines adopted by the Governor or give the appearance of unethical conduct; review all proposed legislation or regulations involving ethics, campaign finance law, freedom of information, and procurement procedures and advise the Governor on the impact of such legislation, if adopted; serve as the Office of the Governor's liaison to the State Ethics Commission, State Elections Enforcement Commission, the Freedom of Information Commission, and the General Assembly regarding initiatives related to ethics, the state's electoral process, and freedom of information issues; recommend legislative initiatives following a comprehensive examination of existing laws, regulations, policies and procedures relating to issues of public integrity; ensure that the Governor's guidelines and the advice of the Special Counsel are consistent with the intent of said laws as interpreted by the respective agency or office charged with their enforcement; work in cooperation with the appropriate agencies regarding any matter involving corruption, unethical practices, mismanagement, gross waste of funds, or any alleged abuse of public authority; coordinate efforts with the Auditors of Public Accounts to cause ethics compliance to be part of the state audit process.

 

2.         Within sixty (60) days from the date of this Executive Order, the Special Counsel For Ethics Compliance shall conduct an Ethics Compliance Audit to identify potential improvements in ethics laws, training, compliance monitoring, and enforcement.  The Special Counsel For Ethics Compliance shall report the results of the Ethics Compliance Audit to the Governor.

 

3.         Within ninety (90) days from the date of this Executive Order, the Special Counsel For Ethics Compliance shall present to the Governor a comprehensive Ethics Compliance Plan that will mandate measures that each agency of the Executive Branch must adopt in order to foster compliance with state ethics laws.    

 

4.         Pending completion and approval of the Ethics Compliance Plan, the Special Counsel For Ethics Compliance shall promptly develop a summary of the requirements of the state ethics laws and regulations. Such summary shall be provided to each and every new state employee prior to the commencement of state service. Such individuals shall sign a statement acknowledging receipt of such summary and agree to comply with the requirements of the state ethics laws and this Executive Order.

 

5.         The Special Counsel For Ethics Compliance shall, in conjunction with the state Ethics Commission, develop and implement an ethics training program for Executive Branch employees and public officials.

 

6.         Within 30 days of this Order, all state employees and public officials who have responsibility for the review, award, or monitoring of state contracts must file a statement of financial interest with the State Ethics Commission under the terms provided for by Conn. Gen. Stat. §1-83.

 

7.         The Special Counsel For Ethics Compliance, in conjunction with the State Ethics Commission, shall establish guidelines for the reporting, acceptance, and accounting of all gifts to the state, as defined by Conn. Gen. Stat. §1-79(e)(5).

 

8.         In addition to the disclosure requirements of Public Act 04-245, those who file affidavits required by that Public Act shall disclose in those affidavits all contributions made to campaigns of candidates for state-wide public office or the General Assembly.  A contractor who is awarded a large state contract, as defined in Public Act 04-245, shall update the affidavit required by that Public Act and this Executive Order on an annual basis. 

 

9.  The Special Counsel For Ethics Compliance shall serve as a Director for The Governor's Residence Conservancy.

 

 

That this Order shall take effect immediately.

 

 

Dated at Hartford, Connecticut, this first day of July 2004.

 

 

 

                                                                                                M. JODI RELL

                                                                                                      Governor

 

 

 

 ***Attached is a letter to all Commissioners and Agency Heads which itemizes what agencies are responsible for in fostering compliance with State ethics laws:

 

 

 

TO:                  COMMISSIONERS AND AGENCY HEADS

 

FROM:            RACHEL S. RUBIN, SPECIAL COUNSEL ON ETHICS COMPLIANCE

 

RE;                  ETHICS COMPLIANCE PLAN

 

In accordance with Executive Order No. 1, following the completion of an Ethics Audit, the Special Counsel for Ethics Compliance was ordered to provide to the Governor an Ethics Compliance Plan. The plan recommends measures that each agency of the Executive Branch must adopt in order to foster compliance with state ethics laws.  Consequently, the Governor has requested that you initiate the following actions:

 

  1. Pursuant to section 1-83(a)(2), each state agency, department, board and commission shall develop an ethics statement as it relates to its mission; a copy of such ethics statement must be sent to the Department of Administrative Services and the Ethics Commission. Many have not been updated over the last several years. Therefore, I ask that you review your ethics statement and submit a revised one to my attention by year-end. Thereafter, it should be updated contemporaneously with any relevant agency policy changes. In all cases it must be subject to review and revision on an annual basis. There shall be a link on the agency’s website so the public, agency personnel and those seeking to do business with or doing business with the agency, may readily review the agency’s ethics policies. This is especially important since many of these policies may be even more stringent than those permitted by the State Code of Ethics.

 

 

  1. Before accepting employment with the State, individuals must be made aware of the Code so that they will understand their general ethical duties as a state employee or public official. Therefore, during the interview process, each person must be given a summary of the State Code of Ethics and agency’s ethics statement by the hiring agency. Furthermore, Governor Rell’s Executive Order No. 1 requires that each new employee sign a statement acknowledging receipt of such summary and agree to comply with the requirements of the state ethics laws. Attached is a letter from Governor Rell which should be provided to each potential employee, the latest version of the State Ethics Commission’s Guide to the Code of Ethics, and a sample acknowledgement form. 

 

  1. Before any state person leaves state service, an exit interview should be conducted by the agency’s Ethics Liaison Officer (see below) to once again remind the individual of potential issues relating to future employment opportunities. A written summary of the post-state employment rules should be provided at that time. This summary is included in the Ethics Commission’s Guide to the Code.

 

  1. Appointment of Ethics Liaison Officer. Appoint an individual in your agency to serve as an Ethics Liaison Officer. This officer shall be a member of management and be responsible for the duties as outlined below.  You must notify me of your designee by December 10th. On December 15th at 9:30, a meeting of all designated Ethics Liaison Officers will be held. At that time, I will go over their responsibilities. In addition, a representative from the Ethics Commission will be there to conduct training so that they are aware of the general requirements of the Code.

 

The Ethics Liaison Officer shall be responsible for coordinating appropriate training programs, monitoring agency policies relevant to ethics compliance, and serve as a resource for ethics guidance and advice. The Ethics Liaison Officer will be the liaison to the State Ethics Commission to screen and refer issues to the Commission. Since the Ethics Liaison Officer cannot or should not provide legal advice regarding ethics issues, he or she will refer an individual to the State Ethics Commission when necessary or seek legal advice from the Commission on such individual’s behalf. The Ethics Liaison Officer should also serve as the liaison to its constituency groups (e.g. contractors) to ensure that they are made aware of relevant restrictions under the Code when they interact with agency personnel. The Officer must also be responsible for disseminating information to keep employees apprised of the latest Commission rulings, enforcement actions, and statutory changes. I will assist the Ethics Liaison Officer in fulfilling his or her assigned duties. The Ethics Liaison Officer is not to be considered an enforcement officer but rather an informational resource and counselor. I suggest that the Officer have direct access to the agency head on these matters. Furthermore, if you are one of the larger agencies with multiple locations, you may want to consider a designee in each of the locations.

 

Suggested qualifications:  the individual cannot have been the subject of a prior complaint or controversy before the Ethics Commission or otherwise be found to have been guilty of a misdemeanor or felony crime. Every attempt should be made to select an Ethics Liaison Officer that has good communication skills, who colleagues respect and trust and who is easily approachable and accessible.

 

 


Dear Potential State of Connecticut Employee:

 

Thank you for considering employment with the State of Connecticut. As an employee for the State, you will be bound by the State Code of Ethics for Public Officials and State Employees. We would like to give you an introduction to this Code as you consider employment with the State. A copy of the Guide to the Code of Ethics for Public Officials and State Employees is attached.

 

Before you accept any employment with the State of Connecticut, you must be aware of the Code and should consider any possible conflict of interests. The principle provisions of the Code are as follows:

 

  • GIFTS.  In general, state employees are prohibited from accepting gifts from anyone doing business with, seeking to do business with, or directly regulated by the state employee’s agency or department or from persons known to be a registered lobbyist or lobbyist’s representative.
  • FINANCIAL BENEFIT. A state employee is prohibited from using his/her office for the financial benefit of the individual, certain family members, or that of an associated business.
  • OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT. A state employee may not accept outside employment which will impair his/her independence of judgment as to official state duties or which would induce the disclosure of confidential information. Generally, outside employment is barred if the private employer can benefit from the state employee’s official actions.
  • FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. Certain state employees are required to file a financial disclosure statement with the State Ethics Commission. This statement will be considered public information.
  • POST-STATE EMPLOYMENT. There may be post-employment restrictions, known as “revolving door” prohibitions. For example, there are restrictions on accepting employment with a party to certain contracts if you were involved in the negotiation or award of the contract; for one year after leaving state service, you may not represent anyone for compensation before your former agency; certain designated individuals in the State’s regulatory agencies may not, for one year after leaving state service, accept employment with any business subject to regulation by their former agency.

 

Please be advised that this is only a general overview. If you have specific questions about the State Code of Ethics, you should ask for the contact information for the agency’s Ethics Liaison Officer or call the State Ethics Commission directly at (860) 566-4472.

 

Again, thank you for your consideration and best wishes in your job search.

 

Sincerely,

 

Governor M. Jodi Rell

 


A GUIDE TO THE 

CODE OF ETHICS FOR

PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND STATE EMPLOYEES

2004

 

NOTE:  This Guide summarizes only the main points of the Code.  For the full text, with all conditions and exceptions, consult Connecticut General Statutes, Chapter 10, Part I.  For interpretations of the Code contact the Ethics Commission.

 

WHO MUST COMPLY:  All state officials and employees (except judges).  NOTE:  all officials and employees of the State's Quasi-Public Agencies are included in the Code's definitions of "public official" or "state employee", and are subject to the Code.  The provisions on the last page apply to former public officials and state employees.

 

WHAT STANDARDS DOES THE CODE SET:  The ethical rules are contained in Connecticut General Statutes §§1-84 through 1-86.  Basically, these sections are intended to prevent one from using public position or authority for personal financial benefit.  The principal provisions of §1-84 prohibit:

 

        -acceptance of outside employment which will impair independence of judgment as to official duties or require or induce disclosure of confidential information gained in state service.  (Generally outside employment is barred if the private employer can benefit from the state servant's official actions.  For example, the individual in his or her state capacity has regulatory or contractual authority over the private entity.  A state servant is not prohibited, however, from using his or her expertise for private gain, as long as no provision of the Code is violated in the process);

 

        -use of public position or confidential information gained in state service for the financial benefit of the individual, his or her family (spouse, child, child's spouse, parent, brother or sister), or an "associated business" (defined to include any entity through which business for profit or not for profit is conducted in which the state servant, or an immediate family member, is a director, officer or owner) (NOTE:  There is an exception to this definition, however, for unpaid service as an officer or director of a non-profit entity.);

 

        -representation of another for compensation, or being a member of a business which represents a client for compensation, before:  Banking Department; Connecticut Siting Council; Department of Environmental Protection; Claims Commissioner; office within Consumer Protection Department which carries out duties of the former Department of Liquor Control; Connecticut Real Estate Commission; Department of Public Utility Control; Department of Motor Vehicles; Insurance Department; State Insurance Purchasing Board; Gaming Policy Board; Division of Special Revenue; and Office of Health Care Access.  (Excepted from this prohibition are members of boards, commissions, and quasi-public agencies who receive no compensation other than per diem, expenses, or both, and teaching or research professional employees of public institutions of higher education provided their actions are not otherwise in violation of the Code of Ethics.);

 

        -solicitation or acceptance of anything of value based on an understanding that one's official action will be influenced thereby.  (Prohibition applies to candidates and to anyone offering or giving the thing of value);

 

        -entering into contracts with the State valued at $100 or more, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process.  (Ban extends to immediate family and associated businesses but excepts executive branch and quasi-public agency officials who receive no compensation except per diem, expenses, or both, unless official has control over subject matter of contract.  Contracts of employment as a state employee and contracts made by court appointment are exempt from the provision.)  Additionally, no executive head of an agency; no executive head of a quasi-public agency; and no member of such individual's immediate family or a business with which he is associated may enter into any contract with that agency or quasi-public agency;

 

        -acceptance of any gift or gifts from one known to be a registered lobbyist or lobbyist's representative.  (Limitation also applies to candidates, immediate family and staff members.  "Gift" does not include food and drink totaling less than fifty dollars per person in a calendar year, if consumed on occasions at which the lobbyist, or a representative of the lobbyist, furnishing the food and drink is in attendance.  In a restaurant setting, for the exception to apply, the lobbyist must be seated at the same table as the public official during the portion of the drinks or meal for which the lobbyist pays.  Among the other items excluded from the term are presents given by individuals incident to "major life events", ceremonial awards costing less than one hundred dollars, benefits costing less than ten dollars per person per occasion up to fifty dollars total in a calendar year, and gifts to the state.);

 

        -acceptance of any gift or gifts from any person doing business with, seeking to do business with or directly regulated by the state servant's agency or department.  (NOTE:  the same exceptions to the lobbyist gift provision listed above also apply to this gift limitation.)

 

        -acceptance of any fee or honorarium given in return for a speech or appearance made or article written in one's official capacity.  (Acceptance of the individual's necessary expenses is permissible, however.);

        -interference with or solicitation of lobbying contracts for any person.

 

Section 1-85 (substantial conflict) and §1-86 (potential conflict) are distinct but related provisions to consider when a possible conflict is identified:

 

(1)     If faced with taking official action which you can expect will directly affect your financial interests, or that of your spouse, dependent child, or an associated business, distinct from others in your occupation or group (e.g., taking official action on the awarding of a contract to a private business you own) you have a substantial conflict of interest under §1-85 and may not act under any circumstances.

 

(2)     However, if your financial interest is shared by the other members of your profession, occupation, or group (e.g., a public official/teacher acting on a matter that will result in a uniform financial benefit to all teachers) you proceed under the rules of §1-86.  Specifically:  (A) if one is a member of a regulatory agency, one must either be excused or prepare, under penalty of false statement, a written statement (to be placed in the minutes of the individual's agency, copy to the Ethics Commission) describing the potential conflict and stating why, despite the situation, one can act fairly, objectively and in the public interest; or (B) if not a member of a regulatory agency, the individual must prepare a written statement, under penalty of false statement, which describes the potential conflict.  The individual must deliver the statement to his or her superior, who will assign the matter to another who is not subordinate to the individual with the conflict.  (If one has no immediate superior, deliver the statement to the Ethics Commission for guidance on how to proceed.)

 

(3)     Under §1-86, if the financial effect on you, a family member, or an associated business is insignificant(i.e. less than $100 in a calendar year), or no different than that of a substantial segment of the general public (e.g., a regulatory official approving an increase in residential electric rates), you may act without having to follow §1-86 procedures.

 

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE:  Certain public servants in significant positions in the Legislative and Executive Branches of State government and the State's Quasi-Public Agencies must file annually with the Ethics Commission by May 1 statements of financial interests held during the previous year.

 

        Additionally, each state servant must disclose to the Commission, within thirty days, any "necessary expense" payments which the individual receives in his or her capacity as a public official or state employee if lodging and/or out-of-state travel is included, unless such expenses are paid for by the Federal Government or another State Government.

 

        Also, whenever a gift to the state incidentally benefits a public official or state employee in the amount of fifty dollars or more and is donated by an individual or entity regulated by, doing business with, or seeking to do business with the recipient agency, the individual's superior, shall certify in writing to the Ethics Commission, prior to the acceptance of the benefit, that the gift, in fact, facilitates state action or functions and is sanctioned by the recipient agency, notwithstanding any potential conflict of interests.  An example of such a gift to the state is when a regulated entity pays the cost for a state regulatory employee to take a course relevant to his or her area of expertise.

 

ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES, PENALTIES:  Enforcement of the Code is initiated by a complaint, filed by the Commission or any member of the public.  (In most instances, a Commission complaint is preceded by a confidential staff evaluation.)  A two-stage process follows:  (1) confidential investigation and probable cause hearing; (2) if probable cause is found, a public hearing to determine if the Code has been violated.  (At any stage of the process the Commission and Respondent may negotiate a settlement.)  After a finding or admission of a violation, the Commission can order the Respondent to comply with the Code in the future, file any required report or statement, and pay a civil penalty.

 

        Alternatively, for failure to file a report, statement, or other information required by the Code the Commission can, after a single hearing, impose a civil penalty of up to $10 per day, the aggregate penalty for any one violation not to exceed $2,000.

 

        If the Commission concludes a violation was intentional, it can refer the matter to the Chief State's Attorney for action.  An intentional violation of the Code is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $2,000, a jail term of up to one year, or both.

 

        The Attorney General may sue for up to three times the economic gain received through knowingly committing or knowingly profiting from a violation of the Code.

 

        The Commission is authorized to protect and keep confidential the identity of any individual who provides information regarding a possible violation of the Code.

 

IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE CODE:  Anyone subject to the Code may request the Commission's advice (advisory opinion) as to how the Code applies to a situation.  The Commission staff also provides informal advisory letters when the question posed is unambiguous or has been previously addressed by a Commission opinion.  Finally, staff is available to discuss application of the Code to your particular issue on a confidential basis.

 

        If you have any questions about this Guide or desire more information about the Ethics laws, please contact the Commission staff or visit the Commission's website (www.ethics.state.ct.us).

 

 

State Ethics Commission

20 Trinity Street, Suite 205

Hartford, CT 06106-1660

Phone:  (860) 566-4472   Fax:  (860) 566-3806

Hours:  Weekdays 8:30 - 4:30


 

ETHICS CODE PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO

THOSE LEAVING STATE OR QUASI-PUBLIC AGENCY SERVICE

 

1.  NO FORMER PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR STATE EMPLOYEE MAY DISCLOSE OR USE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, GAINED IN STATE SERVICE, FOR THE FINANCIAL BENEFIT OF ANY PERSON.

 

        This is a lifetime prohibition.  "Confidential information" is any information not generally available to the public.  The information may be in any form (written, photographic, recorded, computerized, etc.) including orally transmitted information, e.g., conversations, negotiations, etc.

 

2.  NO FORMER EXECUTIVE BRANCH OR QUASI-PUBLIC AGENCY OFFICIAL OR STATE EMPLOYEE MAY REPRESENT ANYONE (OTHER THAN THE STATE) CONCERNING ANY PARTICULAR MATTER (1) IN WHICH HE OR SHE PARTICIPATED PERSONALLY AND SUBSTANTIALLY WHILE IN STATE SERVICE AND (2) IN WHICH THE STATE HAS A SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST.

 

        This is a lifetime prohibition.  It applies regardless of where the representation occurs and whether or not compensation is involved.  The term "particular matter" must almost always be determined on a case by case basis.  Although the concept is essentially a narrow one, a specific "particular matter" (e.g., an administrative enforcement proceeding) cannot be further divided into separate phases (prehearing investigation, hearing, decision, etc.)  To hold otherwise would frustrate a principal purpose of this provision:  prevention of side switching in the midst of on-going state proceedings.

 

3.  NO FORMER EXECUTIVE BRANCH OR QUASI-PUBLIC AGENCY OFFICIAL OR STATE aEMPLOYEE SHALL, FOR ONE YEAR AFTER LEAVING STATE SERVICE, REPRESENT ANYONE (OTHER THAN THE STATE) FOR COMPENSATION BEFORE THE AGENCY IN WHICH HE OR SHE WAS EMPLOYED AT THE TIME OF LEAVING STATE SERVICE, CONCERNING ANY MATTER IN WHICH THE STATE HAS A SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST.

 

        "Represent" (under both nos. 2. and 3.) includes any action which reveals the identity of the individual, e.g., a personal appearance, phone call, signature on a document, identification on a firm's letterhead, etc. 

 

        NOTE:  A Commission policy has been established to allow former state servants to enter into consulting and other employment contracts with their former agencies within the one year period.  Specifically, such conduct is permitted, as long as the re-employment is at no greater pay level than the individual was receiving at the time of separation from state service plus necessary expenses.  In essence, by prohibiting the negotiation of the compensation rate, this policy prevents improper use of influence and contacts for financial advantage.  At the same time, employment options of former state servants are not limited unnecessarily and the State is not denied these individuals' expertise.  Those with questions concerning this policy should contact a Commission attorney.

 

4.  NO FORMER PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR STATE EMPLOYEE WHO PARTICIPATED SUBSTANTIALLY IN, OR SUPERVISED, THE NEGOTIATION OR AWARD OF A STATE CONTRACT VALUED AT $50,000 OR MORE MAY ACCEPT EMPLOYMENT WITH A PARTY TO THE CONTRACT (OTHER THAN THE STATE) FOR ONE YEAR AFTER RESIGNATION FROM STATE SERVICE IF THE RESIGNATION OCCURS WITHIN ONE YEAR AFTER THE CONTRACT WAS SIGNED.

 

        Substantial participation is not limited to the chief negotiator or the individual who signs the contract.  Rather, the concept of substantial participation (under both nos. 2. and 4.) applies whenever the individual exercises discretionary authority at any level of the process.  "Employment" includes work as an independent contractor or consultant.

 

5.            PERSONS WHO SERVE IN ONE OF APPROXIMATELY 75 SENIOR POSITIONS IN THE STATE'S REGULATORY AGENCIES ARE PROHIBITED, FOR ONE YEAR AFTER LEAVING STATE SERVICE, FROM ACCEPTING EMPLOYMENT WITH ANY BUSINESS SUBJECT TO REGULATION BY THEIR FORMER AGENCY.

 

        (NOTE:  positions to which this restriction applies are listed in Regulations of Conn. State Agencies §1-92-40a.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revised:  October, 2003 (poguide)


 State of Connecticut

State Code of Ethics

Acknowledgement of Receipt

 

I, _ (Print Name) ______________, have received a copy of the State Ethics Commission’s Guide to the Code of Ethics for Public Officials and State Employees and the Ethics Statement for (Print Agency Name). I understand and agree that, as a public employee, I must use my best efforts to comply with the standards set forth within.

 

 

__________________________________        __________________

Signature                                                                   Date

 

  

By Her Excellency’s Command:

 

 

 

____________________________________

Susan Bysiewicz

Secretary of the State






Printable Version  Previous Next


Home | CT.gov Home Send Feedback | Login |  Register

State of Connecticut Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.  Copyright © 2002 - 2011 State of Connecticut.