Governor Rell: View the Lt. Governor's Complete Report to Governor John G. Rowland


View the Lt. Governor's Complete Report to Governor John G. Rowland
November 26, 1999

John G. Rowland
Governor, State of Connecticut
Executive Chambers
State Capitol
Hartford, Connecticut

Dear Governor Rowland:

On August 6 you asked me to develop a comprehensive plan to ensure that Connecticut’s schools and libraries are prepared to meet the computer and information technology needs of the 21st Century. This letter serves as a final report of my findings and recommendations.

Since August I have visited more than two dozen schools across the state, spoken with a number of federal officials and state legislators, read countless reports and surveys, met with officials of the state Board of Education, Department of Higher Education, State Library, Department of Information Technology, Connecticut Association of Boards of Education, Connecticut Conference of Independent Colleges, Connecticut Education Association, Joint Committee on Educational Technology, Connecticut Association of Public School Superintendents, Connecticut Voices for Children, Connecticut Academy of Science and a host of other groups and organizations.

I am truly grateful for the information and assistance provided to me by teachers, students, local school administrators, representatives of the above-listed organizations, business leaders and other concerned citizens who have been an important part of my efforts during the last four months.

Their support has been invaluable.

I would also like to acknowledge the work and dedication of the professionals – teachers, staff and administrators – in our public schools who have worked tirelessly to establish and promote the integration of information technology into the educational system. My school visits around the state have afforded me the opportunity to see first-hand the technological advancements being made at all grade levels. Great things are happening in our schools, and the future is bright for our students.

Though awed by some of the designs and operations of the technology itself, I was far more impressed by the passion and commitment of educators who have taken the lead in implementing educational technology applications. They fully understand and appreciate the promise that informational technology holds in educational settings, and they have worked hard, on behalf of our students, to make that technology accessible, understandable and user-friendly. They deserve our gratitude and our respect.

The Growing Importance of Information Technology

There is, I have found, a growing concern in the state that more needs to be done to integrate information technology into classroom learning. We must prepare our students, and indeed all our citizens, for the challenges that will be inherent in an increasingly technology-driven economy and society.

Without question, computers have grown to play a progressively more important and integrated role in nearly every aspect of our lives. They are the operational controls of the cars we drive, the planes in which we fly, the banking machines we use, even many of the heating systems found in our homes. Computers are used in traffic signals, elevators, gasoline pumps, cash registers, police cruisers and golf carts. Indeed, as evidenced by the Y2K phenomenon, it is clear that computers have become a vital lifeline that links us to commerce, family, business and education.

Quite frankly, it is astonishing to think how thoroughly pervasive computers have become in our society, given the relatively short history of computer development and usage. It was little more than 50 years ago that ENIAC, the first general-purpose computer, was designed and put into use. Unwieldy and exceedingly elementary by today’s technology standards, ENIAC utilized 18,000 vacuum tubes and occupied 1,800 square feet of space. The behemoth size of ENIAC is almost inconceivable today in light of the proliferation of compact and lightweight desktop and laptop computers.

In 1971, the first microprocessor was released by Intel and ten years later, in 1981, IBM introduced its first personal computers (PC’s), making computers more affordable and practical for home and office use. And it was just ten years ago that the World Wide Web was created by Dr. Tim Berners-Lee of the European Organization for Nuclear Research.

The number of people who have gone online since the web’s introduction in 1989 has grown geometrically. In fact, according to an eGlobal Report released this past June by eMarketer, the number of active internet users around the world will grow to 130.6 million by the end of this year. An estimated 350 million users will be online by 2003, an amazing increase of 167% in just four short years. The anticipated growth rates of internet commerce are just as startling, with revenues expected to increase from $98.4 billion in 1999 to more than $1.2 trillion by 2003.

It is clear from this brief history and from the above-mentioned statistics that the potential for future computer development and information technology application is limitless. Computers will become a truly ubiquitous presence in our lives at home, in the workplace and in the classroom.

The Critical Role of Educational Technology

To a very large extent, private industry and natural market forces will direct and control information technology advances and usage in the home and at the workplace. Governments, however, must bear most of the responsibility for planning, fostering and implementing a significantly broadened integration of information technology in the classrooms of Connecticut.

The importance of this responsibility cannot be understated and cannot be ignored, for the students in our schools today will be the business, government and community leaders of tomorrow.

They will need to compete and to excel in an increasingly technology-based economy, and success will depend in large part on the training and education they receive during their school years.

As we greet the dawning of the 21st Century, we must improve that training and education, and we must ensure that our students have access to state-of-the-art computer technology from kindergarten through graduate school. That means that computers in the classroom must become as commonplace as a chalkboard, and that collaborative educational technology efforts must be undertaken between teachers, students, parents and administrators.

To be sure, we in Connecticut have already begun to address some of the technology needs of our schools and libraries. For instance, our state Department of Education has developed a Statewide Educational Technology Plan and offers a range of programs and personnel resources directed at assisting local school districts on a variety of educational technology issues. Also, the state has allocated $30 million in grants in the past few years to cities and towns to cover computer wiring and connectivity costs. Further, Connecticut municipalities have received $22.3 million from the federal government under the Universal Service Fund (or E-Rate) program.

While progress has indeed been made, there is still room for improvement in terms of integrating information technology into classroom learning. In July, 1999 the Progressive Policy Institute issued a "State New Economy Index" in which it rated the 50 individual states in terms of pertinent economic indicators and overall preparedness for the "new economy" of the new millennium. The good news is that Connecticut ranked fifth in the nation as a leader in the new economy, meaning that we are well positioned and well prepared in terms of workforce education, venture capital, patents, scientists and engineers, high tech jobs, initial public offerings, online population, and other economic-based factors.

The less encouraging news is that Connecticut ranks 42nd in the nation in terms of technology in schools. The ranking was based on a "weighted measure of the percentage of classrooms wired for the Internet, teachers with technology training, and schools with more than 50 percent of teachers having school-based e-mail accounts."

While I do not believe that these measures by themselves offer a true and complete reflection of our technological capabilities, Connecticut’s low ranking in this index is simply unacceptable, especially concerning something as important as the integration of technology education in the classroom.

Simply put, educational technology must become a serious priority of state government, for Connecticut cannot be off-line when it comes to computers in the classroom.

Too many classrooms continue to be without computers. Too many schools and classrooms have yet to be wired or connected to computer systems. Too many teachers have not had the opportunity for specialized, and sometimes basic, computer training. Too many administrators are frustrated by the lack of resources for technology enhancements and for appropriate support staff. And too few students have ample and properly tutored access to school-based computers and the internet.

But the critical value of information technology in the classroom cannot be measured simply by the number of wires coming into a building or a classroom or by the number of computers on an inventory list. It’s not about the latest software programs or the most powerful hard drives. It’s about using technology to open new doors to learning. It’s about serving teachers and inspiring students.

Technology may be used for online research, individualized student instruction, homework assignments, in-class labs and experiments, and facilitating communication between students and between parents and teachers. It promotes inquiry learning. It fosters cooperative learning. It encourages after-class schoolwork.

In short, it serves to more seriously engage students in all aspects of learning. No longer is a student’s venue for learning contained within the walls of a classroom or the covers of a book. A student learning about China may travel electronically to that country and take a video tour of the cultural and governmental sites or conduct a real-time interview with a Chinese student or official. A student whose own district does not offer a particular course could use distance learning to enroll in another district and take the course online. A student researching a paper on Franklin Roosevelt could use video and voice technology to personally see and hear the speeches of a president who died decades before they were born.

I believe the potential for technology applications in educational settings is unlimited. It will open new doors and generations of young minds to new worlds, new experiences and new opportunities for learning. It will also be of critical importance in training the workforce of the future.

Preparing the Workforce for the 21st Century

Connecticut has seen an abundance of business and job growth in the past five years, with an emphasis on the development of technology-based businesses. In fact, the state Department of Labor (DOL) has estimated that technology-based businesses currently account for one out of every six jobs in Connecticut, and the highest growth rates in employment opportunities are expected to occur in the technology industry.

More specifically, DOL predicts a 93.2 percent increase in estimated employment opportunities for computer engineers and a 77.1 percent increase for systems analysts positions. These two positions remain the top two occupations ranked by growth in the state, reflecting a national trend.

But nearly all occupations, regardless of type, require some computer exposure or use. For instance, manufacturing employees operate machines guided, in large part, by computer programs. Many police officers now have lap top computers in their cruisers to record arrest information or retrieve background information. Health care workers, from doctors and nurses to x-ray technicians, constantly use a host of specialized and sophisticated medical technology equipment in delivering patient care. Most government employees and private sector office employees have grown dependent on the use of desktop PC’s, fax machines, e-mail and voice mail.

Given that information technology now transcends nearly every occupation and every industry sector, it is vital that we prepare our students, the workforce of tomorrow, in terms of computer proficiency and technology skill training. Continued economic expansion and growth in Connecticut will depend on it. Satisfying, well-paying jobs for workers will depend on it. A steady stream of skilled, trained workers for employers will depend on it.

The Digital Divide

As we look to the future and as we move forward with information technology, we must continually ask who will be left behind. A so-called digital divide does exist and it widens as technology evolves. It’s real and it’s disturbing.

But the divide cannot be defined solely in economic terms. There are other equally disconcerting divides. Gender divides. Racial divides. Education and training divides. Information divides.

Bridging these digital divides will not be easy, but it must done. In so many ways, information technology has the potential to be a great equalizer, so it must be accessed and utilized unreservedly and affordably by everyone, especially students.

Bridging the digital divides today may in fact allow us to bridge other divides tomorrow, for increased educational and training opportunities will open up a great many new horizons for future generations. From Hartford to Hamden and New London to New Canaan, increased educational technology will translate into increased life opportunities.

And the best way to bridge the digital divide, to train the workforce, to inspire students and open new doors to learning, to completely connect and equip our classrooms and to embrace the growing social and economic force of computers, is to make a high-yield investment in educational technology.

Frankly, it is an investment we cannot afford not to make. The risks only come in not preparing our students and our citizens for the 21st Century.

It will take an investment not just in financial terms, but in commitment, in vision and in planning. If we succeed, and we must, our efforts will lead to a renewed overall investment in public education and to a major investment in our future workforce.

Recommendations

In order to begin making the investments necessary to ensure that our schools and libraries are prepared to meet the computer and information technology needs of the 21st Century, I would recommend:

  • That all Connecticut students be "Cyber-Ready by the Sixth Grade" in terms of competency in the use of technology for life-long learning. Specific technology skill training, such as computer and technology literacy, information literacy and the ability to integrate technology effectively in all aspects of learning, should be made a formal part of local curriculum and should be measured by appropriate and periodic grade-level benchmarks. Model benchmarks would be developed by the state Board of Education, by July 1, 2000, and distributed to local school districts for guidance and utilization.
  • That all Connecticut K-12 classrooms be fully wired and connected to the Internet and to a local area network by January 1, 2004. Currently, less than one-third of classrooms are fully connected. It is recommended that $10 million be invested (expended) by the state each year for the next three years to ensure that the remaining two-thirds of classrooms are on the information superhighway by January 1, 2004. It is further recommended that funds be weighted in distribution to those districts lagging in connectivity.
  • That the state Department of Information Technology (DOIT) develop a plan, by June 1, 2000, for implementation by January 1, 2003, of a Connecticut Education Network (CEN). CEN will allow for the connection of all Connecticut colleges and universities, libraries and elementary and secondary schools to a statewide high speed, flexible network providing video, voice and data transmissions. Funding totaling $20 to $25 million will be needed over the next four years, with an initial investment of $5 million in each of the next two years.
  • That a new independent authority be established, via legislation, to manage, plan and advocate for a statewide high speed, flexible, robust network, known as the Connecticut Education Network, as well as a Digital Library, in order to provide reliable universal communication links to Connecticut schools, libraries and institutions of higher education with sufficient capacity to deliver state-of-the-art access to education, training, and electronic information.

The authority, which should fall within the purview of DOIT for administrative purposes, should oversee the development and operation of the Connecticut Education Network and Digital Library, as well as set broad operating policy, undertake planning services and identify and coordinate all necessary fiscal needs. Authority membership should reflect public and private constituencies with a direct interest in meeting the goals outlined above.

  • That a Connecticut Digital Library be established as a component of the Connecticut Education Network to ensure online access by all students and citizens to essential library and information resources. The keystone of the library would be a collection of on-line electronic full-text databases, a statewide electronic catalog and interlibrary loan system and the electronic and physical delivery of library resources. The Connecticut Digital Library shall include elements specifically designed to meet the educational and research needs of the general public, higher education students and faculty and K-12 students and teachers. $2 million each year for the next 3 years would be provided for funding the Connecticut Digital Library.
  • That a Parent Academy be established, under the auspices of the CT Voices for Children, for the training of parents of K-12 students in computer technology usage. Parents who satisfactorily complete Parent Academy training would be eligible for low-interest bank loans and special vendor discounts for computer purchases and upgrades. Existing technology-equipped facilities, such as schools, colleges and libraries, would be the host sites of such local or regional Parent Academy programs and instructors would be recruited from community volunteers (students, businesspeople, teachers, faculty, computer professionals and others) proficient in information technology. If a smaller scale Parent Academy initiative is to be established at the outset, I would recommend that we target participation within the state’s priority school districts. A $50,000 appropriation would be made to the CT Voices for Children for administration and curriculum development purposes.
  • That we require that all candidates, beginning with the 2000-2001 academic year, enrolled at an accredited institution of higher education in Connecticut and taking a course of study leading to an initial, provisional or professional teaching certificate, participate in compulsory course work and achieve minimum standards of proficiency in understanding, using and implementing technology in education. Such compulsory course work and minimum standards of proficiency shall be developed by the state Board of Education, in consultation with the state Department of Higher Education.
  • That we revise continuing education unit requirements for licensed teachers to include enhanced training, as designed by the state Board of Education, to promote the integration of technology into teaching and learning and to further develop professional skills that will augment their ability to enable their students to become life-long learners using technology.
  • That each licensed and currently employed teacher who purchases or upgrades a home computer shall have their Connecticut adjusted gross income reduced, up to a maximum of $1,000, in the taxable year in which such purchase or upgrade is made. Licensed and currently active teachers may be eligible for such taxable income reductions once every four years.
  • That higher education institutions in Connecticut incrementally but aggressively expand on-line learning opportunities in terms of course offerings and full degree programs. Toward that end, it is recommended that funds in the amount of $2 million each year for the next three years be provided to the 27-member Connecticut Distance Learning Consortium for, among other things, faculty training, infrastructure development, course development, course hosting, development of mechanisms for course transferability and recognition between member institutions, student help desk support, financial aid coordination, and marketing of on-line offerings.
  • That the state Department of Education be required to develop, by July 1, 2000, in conjunction with DOIT, specific minimum technology infrastructure standards, as well as suggested model technology infrastructure standards, for use in guiding local school districts in school construction and reconstruction projects. As a condition of approval for school construction grant reimbursement, for applications filed on or after September 1, 2000, local school districts must incorporate the state-designated minimum technology infrastructure standards in their construction proposals.
  • That Connecticut-based businesses that donate new computers (defined as 2 years-old or newer) or computer consulting services to local school districts receive a credit on their annual corporation tax obligation to the state in an amount equivalent to fifty percent of the purchase price of the computers (if new, or fair market value if used) or fifty percent of the fair market value of computer consulting services donated. A maximum of $5 million in credits will be made available each year for purposes of this program. Corporate entities will be limited to $75,000 in credits each income year.
  • That DOIT oversee the preparation and submission of a statewide application for Universal Service Funds (USF - so-called E-Rate funds) in December, 2000, to enhance connectivity to the Connecticut Education Network, maximize participation and grant attainment rates, and reduce overly burdensome administrative and paperwork requirements which currently seek to discourage local involvement. To accomplish this, DOIT shall prepare a feasibility report by March, 2000 which sets forth (1) a review of how and under what circumstances other states have successfully submitted statewide applications to the USF, (2) an analysis of what should specifically be incorporated into Connecticut’s application and (3) an outline of necessary actions to be taken by DOIT for completion of a statewide USF application. DOIT shall work in consultation with the state Department of Education, the state Department of Higher Education, the state Library, representatives of Regional Education Service Centers and any other groups or organizations necessary to prepare the feasibility report and statewide application submission.
  • That the state Department of Education develop and provide a centralized web site on which Connecticut educators could post and share suggested grade-specific or topic-specific lesson plans, curriculum resources and technology resource opportunities, as well as best practices on the use of technology in instruction.
  • That Connecticut teachers, through their professional organizations, be encouraged to formally establish a "Technology Partnering Program" by which more technologically-skilled educators could team with colleagues wishing to enhance their personal and professional knowledge of computers, information technology and the integration of information technology in classroom teaching. Options should be explored for on-site mentoring and/or for mentoring via voice, video or data transmissions.
  • That the state Department of Education be required to biennially update the Statewide Educational Technology Plan and present such plan to the Governor and General Assembly by January 15 of each reporting year.
  • That local school districts be encouraged to target at least two percent of their annual budget appropriations solely for technology-related purchases, programs and services, including, but not limited to, professional development, hardware and software acquisition and connectivity needs.
  • That the Connecticut Congressional delegation seek federal funding for the development and administration of a new Information Technology Resource Program for local school districts. Under this new program, which could be administered by the state’s six Regional Education Service Centers, personnel would be hired to serve as resources, on an as requested basis, for teachers and school districts seeking technical or program support services. Technical services could be accessed for those districts not employing informational technology support staff. Program services could be accessed by all districts seeking guidance on software purchases, educational technology programs and classroom applications.
  • That the state Office of Policy and Management dedicate personnel resources to identifying and securing all available funding from the federal government, private corporations and philanthropic foundations to support this initiative or components of this initiative, such as hardware and software acquisition, professional development, curricula development, and connectivity.

I believe that these recommendations, once implemented, will offer the best opportunities to our children, our teachers and our parents in terms of integrating state-of-the-art information technology into the classroom.

Thank you, Governor, for asking me to undertake this charge. I look forward to working with you to ensure that these recommendations are implemented and that our investment in the future of education technology in the state of Connecticut brings untold dividends in the 21st Century.

Sincerely,

{jodisign.jpg (4138 bytes)}

M. Jodi Rell
Lieutenant Governor



Content Last Modified on 8/27/2003 11:32:00 AM






Home | CT.gov Home Send Feedback | Login |  Register

State of Connecticut Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.  Copyright © 2002 - 2009 State of Connecticut.